redbroch

Approach

How an engagement runs.

There is no menu here. There is a way of working and a set of steps, and the first one is spending time with your people before anybody writes a line of code.

Watercolor study of a ruined broch entrance with a massive stone lintel and irregular drystone masonry.

The method

Understand the work. Build around it.

The order matters more than any single step. Most failed pilots were built before anybody established what was worth building.

  1. Interview and shadow

    We spend the first days inside the work. Partners, managers, seniors, administrators. We ask what took longest last week and what got done twice. We watch a return get assembled, a binder get built, a review get cleared. The written process and the real one are usually different, and the difference is where the work is.

  2. Present our findings

    We come back with a list. For each item: what it costs the firm now, what we think software does to that, how confident we are, and what it would take to build. Some of the list is things to stop doing rather than things to automate. You get the whole list, including what we ruled out and why.

  3. Build it

    We pick one thing and build it properly, in your environment, against your real data, under your access controls. You watch it work on your own files. When it gets something wrong, and it will, you see that too, which is the part a vendor demonstration never shows you.

  4. Deploy and hand over

    We get it in front of the people whose work it changes, sit with them while they use it, and fix what the first fortnight turns up. Then we write down how it works, what it costs to run, what breaks it and who in the firm owns it now.

The engagement

Ways to work together.

Each step is designed to be worth doing on its own and to make the next one easier to judge. Pricing is a conversation, because what we would charge depends on what the work turns out to be.

What we commit to

What you can expect from us.

  • The ownership terms are clear.

    Your agreement distinguishes client-specific deliverables from reusable Redbroch components and third-party tools. We explain what your firm owns, what is licensed and how you can keep using the system.

  • The output can be traced.

    Anything the system tells your people should be checkable against the document it came from. An answer that cannot be traced is an answer a reviewer cannot sign.

  • We use your existing systems where practical.

    We start with the tools and environment your firm already administers. Where another service or local hardware would help, we agree on the design, access and data handling before implementation.

  • We say plainly what we have not established.

    Where something is measured, we show the measurement. Where it is an estimate, we say so and show the working.

  • We say when the answer is a process change.

    Some of what slows a firm down gets worse when software is added to it. We would rather tell you that in week one than build around it.

Where it runs

A home for the system that fits your firm.

The right one depends on what your data is, who your regulator is and what your insurer has already been told. We work it out before we build, and the written version comes with the pilot.

  • Inside your Microsoft tenant

    It runs in the Microsoft 365 and Entra environment your firm already administers, under your existing identity, retention and audit controls. The usual starting point for a firm whose documents already live in SharePoint.

  • On hardware you own

    Local inference can run on machines in your office or your own rack. We document any external connections and decide what may leave that environment before implementation. Slower to stand up and more work to maintain, and sometimes the only answer that fits the engagement.

  • Hosted, with the paperwork done

    Run in a dedicated cloud environment, with the subprocessor list, the data flow diagram and the agreements written out so your risk committee has something to read.

Where to start

Start with a demonstration relevant to your firm.

We would rather show you something working on synthetic examples in your firm’s language than talk about what is possible in general. Tell us what your firm does and where the work piles up, and we will come back with something to react to.

Tell us about your firm